Even the compassionate curiosity of the wisest student of humanity is inadequate for guessing how this or that woman manages to accommodate herself to this solution of the riddle, and to the riddle of a solution, and what dreadful, far-reaching suspicions The gay science stir in her poor, unhinged soul -- and The gay science the ultimate philosophy and skepsis of woman casts anchor at this point!
The "honor" of women really comes into play only here: Often a silence directed at herself, too. He complimented Ruse for his discussions of the research of Bieber, Socarides, Hamer, and LeVay, his account of conversion therapyand his philosophical discussion of the ethical questions involved in The gay science research on sexual orientation, including the possible development of methods to prevent or alter The gay science.
However, he also described the book as "somewhat repetitious". He also credited Murphy with exposing the oversimplification of research such as that of LeVay by the media. She closes her eyes to herself.
All the world is agreed that they are to be brought up as ignorant as possible of erotic matters, and that one has to imbue their souls with a profound sense of shame in such matters until the merest suggestion of such things triggers the most extreme impatience and flight.
But here they are supposed to remain ignorant even in their hearts: Thus a psychic knot has been tied that may have no equal. Rosario described the book as a "welcome addition to the debate" on biological research on homosexuality, and credited Murphy with providing "a scientifically well-informed and balanced review of the recent research and its possible ethical implications" and with being "well-versed in the basic science and cognizant of the enormous theoretical and methodological impediments to doing sound research in this area.
He wrote that while Murphy discussed hypothetical scenarios in which it became possible for scientists to manipulate "sexual orientation in utero or in adults", his "countless scenarios seem contrived and belabored".
He credited Murphy with providing an objective account of sexual orientation research and its ethical implications. She also criticized him for writing "as though ethics and moral philosophy exist outside politics", arguing that "the power relationships that determine what science gets done also circumscribe the extent to which it is done ethically" and that if "scientific inquiring takes place in a context in which its results are certain to be misused, then the ethical innocence it may have in other contexts becomes irrelevant".
Afterward, the same deep silence as before. To catch love and shame in a contradiction and to be forced to experience at the same time delight, surrender, duty, pity, terror, and who knows what else, in the face of the unexpected neighborliness of god and beast!
He commented that, "it seems unlikely that biological research on homosexuality will easily shake off its year-old association with the pathologization of same-sex love", and noted that all of the sexual orientation research Murphy discussed was actually concerned specifically with homosexuality.
Weinrich in Human Biology. He also praised Murphy for helpfully addressing "questions about the supposed naturalness or unnaturalness of homosexual desire and behavior" and for his discussion of "the consequences for society of his lines of thought.
And then to be hurled as by a gruesome lightning bolt, into reality and knowledge, by marriage -- precisely by the man they love and esteem most! They need children and wish for them in a way that is altogether different from that in which a man may wish for children.
Women easily experience their husbands as a question mark concerning their honor, and their children as an apology or atonement. Young women try hard to appear superficial and thoughtless.
In sum, one cannot be too kind about women. The most refined simulate a kind of impertinence. What could be more paradoxical? He criticized Murphy for devoting too much space to discussing anti-gay views and arguments.
A Philosophical Inquiry in "many respects He credited Murphy with being the first person to write a comprehensive work examining these issues, calling him "extremely thorough and exhaustive".The Gay Science [Friedrich Nietzsche, Thomas Common, Paul V.
Cohn, Maude D. Petre] on killarney10mile.com *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. One of Friedrich Nietzsche's classic works, The Gay Science (also known as The Joyful Wisdom), is the first of Nietzsche's writings to proclaim God is dead and to introduce Friedrich Nietzsche's /5(74). Other articles where The Gay Science is discussed: continental philosophy: Nietzsche: In The Gay Science, Nietzsche proclaims that.
quotes from The Gay Science: ‘What, if some day or night a demon were to steal after you into your loneliest loneliness and say to you: 'This life as.
Gay Science: The Ethics of Sexual Orientation Research is a book about scientific research on sexual orientation by the philosopher Timothy F. Murphy.
The book received positive reviews, crediting Murphy with providing a useful discussion of the ethical implications of sexual orientation research. The gay science isn't for everyone, but for those who are interested in the mind of Nietzsche he offers a personal and insightful range of ideas and thoughts.
Read more Published 1 year ago/5(74). The words 'The Gay Science' translate the German title 'Die Frohliche Wissenschaft'. No one, presumably, is going to be misled by the more recent associations of the word 'gay' - it simply means joyful, In The.
and. the of. The Science -! at § this §.Download